Saturday, June 22, 2013

Compulsory Organ Harvesting

Reading the papers for the last few days has got me thinking. I am referring to the Organ Donation Racket that has been unearthed in Tamil Nadu. 

And this is in a state that is lauded for its Cadaver Transplant system that is efficient and transparent.


What did the articles have me thinking about? It is this: We are a nation of 1.2 Billion people, with a crude death rate of 8 (No. of ppl per 1000 ppl who die) corresponding to 9.6 million dead people every year. And yet, most people on the Organ waitlist have to wait a long time or resort to the illegal market to access the organs.

The solution I am suggesting is a bit radical and as many of you may think mad/crazy.
The idea is very simply this: Compulsory organ harvesting from cadavers. I mean remove the getting permission of the deceased’s relatives for organ harvesting.

The immediate question that will be raised is, won’t this make it possible to easily cover medical negligence or errors? The organs will be harvested immediately, leaving no proof of what was done.
The solution to the above problem is that the deceased’s relative, in case they suspect any irregularities should file an official complaint within 2 hours of death or the organs will be harvested.

In case, a complaint is filed, the cadaver must be frozen. A preliminary investigation must be done to check validity of the complaint by a competent team of doctors and if required a post-mortem must be done within 16 hours of death. Why within 16 hours of death? Because, tissues must be harvested with 24 hours of death.  Tissues are specific parts of an organ like cornea, heart valves, skin, bones etc. These tissues can be used for transplantation or for research.

The organ/tissue harvest harvesting must be done by doctors who have specialized in this field. This will make sure that the body that is handed over to the deceased’s relatives bears no or minimal external marks of the surgeries. This will make it more acceptable for a lot of the people.

I know that the idea sounds draconian, but it is the need of the day. Isn't it a crime that a body that has healthy organs is burnt/buried rather then used to save some other precious lives?
Imagine it was you or someone close to you who is waiting for an organ/tissue and so many go to waste every day?
Of course, for my idea to work there should be robust system in place at each district level and going up to the national level.

The system involves having teams of specialist doctors who will harvest the organs, tissues. Teams of doctors, who will investigate the complaints. Mechanism to enable people to register complaints easily. System to prosecute people who have filed vexatious complaints even if there is no probable case to prevent people from simply filing cases to swamp the system. Registry of people waiting for organs/tissues at each district/state/region and national levels. Registry of universities/research companies that need organs/tissues for research.  And a thousand other details that will come up, no doubt.

The best way forward would be to put in place the systems for organ harvesting without compulsory organ harvesting but only volunteered. And once chinks in the system have been ironed out, the compulsory organ harvesting can be rolled out.  

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Conscription For Police Forces in India


Police Reforms in India:

The National Police Commission (1977-81), Ribeiro Committee (1998-99), Padmanabhaiah Committee (2000), Soli Sorabjee Committee (2005) commissions, Supreme Court intervention (2006)  and various other luminaries have been clamouring for police reforms in India. The suggestions are for to insulate the police from political influence, separate the investigation arm from the law & order arm, making the police more sensitive to the common man.

All these reforms will go a long long way in making the Indian police a truly professional service and remove a lot of the pressures & strains on the policemen & policewomen. Yet, I think one area that has been missed by all of these reports, white papers and discussions.

India has one of the worst police to people ratio in the world. Even if all the vacancies are filled in the police force, the ratio will still not be up to the ratio that has been suggested as the ideal.

My suggestion is that all citizens of India should be made to serve in the police for a minimum of 3 years between the ages of 18 to 30 years. This will be a one-time continuous service period. 

The idea is neither novel nor original. Israel has compulsory service for all its citizens between the age of 18 to 24 yrs in its armed forces, with the option of continue after the compulsory 2 yrs. Switzerland has an citizen army with every able body person required to serve when called upon in times of distress. For a long time in human history, before the concept of modernized organized military forces came into being; during wartimes common people were called to augment the military.

Let me tell how the idea of compulsory police service will be beneficial.
In India, police are viewed with suspect and are often the subject to worst criticism coming next only to politicians. Sometimes, these criticisms are made without any understanding of the conditions under which the police have to work. Yes, I agree that sometimes the criticisms are warranted. Most of the criticisms are by the arm chair pundits who have never been on the field with the police working with all the pressures they face. By making people serve in the police, the issues, and the pressures and constrain faced by the police will be seen by all. It will make the people empathize with their fellow officers.

India has a huge problem of unemployment. So many talented people just waste away their lives because they simply do not get an opportunity to showcase their talent. Many are unemployed not because they do not want to work but because they do not get work. This large untapped workforce can be easily channeled to do good for the country.

There are reports that police forces have a myopic view of the minorities. Imagine what a load of good it will do by the infusion of the fresh blood into the police force? Imagine what it will do to improve the number of women personnel serving in the police force.

Why have I suggested that the compulsory service be done anytime between 18 and 30 yrs? Some people would be willing to join the Indian Armed forces or be taking the UPSC. Those people should be given the chance to join the service of their choice. If they make it, they will not be asked to do the compulsory service.

At the time of joining the people would be asked to choose between either compulsory service or voluntary service. The people choosing the voluntary service will obviously have better career progression and perks. However, the voluntary service personnel will have to do a minimum service of 10 years before they can leave the service.

I am sure there will be people who will say that suppose they do not want to do the 3 years compulsory service, what then? A suggestion would be for the people who opt to be placed on a higher tax bracket then people who do their service or that people who do their service will be put on a lower tax bracket.

There are of course, many irons to be worked out in this suggestion; and as the saying goes “the devil lies in the details” there will be many problems that need be solved before this suggestion can be implemented like what role the compulsory drafted people will play etc.

I only hope that the Indian police force become a professional police force that acts as an role model to the other forces in the world.